The debate over Hobart's public transport future has ignited, with a heated discussion between an independent MP and a Hobart councillor regarding the city's best mode of transportation. The state government's recent report suggests a rapid bus network as the ideal solution, but this has sparked controversy and a passionate response from those who believe light rail is the superior choice.
The report, titled "Greater Hobart Rapid Bus Network Strategic Business Case", proposes rapid buses along all three major transport corridors, aiming to provide faster and more reliable public transport for Hobart's daily commuters. Transport Minister Kerry Vincent emphasizes the flexibility and cost-effectiveness of this option for the city's suburbs.
However, MP Kristie Johnston takes issue with this decision, citing the government's own 2020 Northern Suburbs Transit Corridor report. This report found that rail would bring significantly more social and economic benefits to Hobart's northern suburbs compared to a rapid bus service. Johnston argues that the government's 'one-size-fits-all' approach ignores the unique advantages that rail could bring to this specific area.
Hobart councillor Ryan Posselt also voices his criticism, highlighting the council's formal support for light rail in the northern suburbs. He points out that there is strong evidence that rail-based transit can stimulate urban renewal and housing investment along the rail corridor, an effect that is less likely with bus investment. Posselt also questions the government's timeline, stating that a bus network implementation in 2037 is "unacceptable" and that it might as well be light rail if it takes that long.
The Hobart Northern Suburbs Rail Action Group (HNSRAG) has called for the government to reconsider its decision, arguing that a bus rapid transit system is not suitable for the area. HNSRAG President Toby Rowallan supports the concept of bus rapid transit to the Eastern Shore and Kingston, but insists that a new commuter rail service is the optimal plan. He believes that this plan is "a rapid route to failure" and that it will not be delivered before the stadium is completed, nor is it the cheaper or more affordable option as claimed by the government.
The government's business case, however, concludes that the rapid bus network is "easier, faster, and cheaper to implement than an equivalent light rail network". This has led to a heated debate, with differing opinions on the best way to serve Hobart's public transport needs. The controversy invites further discussion and invites the public to share their thoughts, with the question remaining: which mode of transport will ultimately be chosen for Hobart's future?
